Saturday, June 29, 2013

[Linenkugel] Technology in Education - edweek.org



The rapid and constant pace of change in technology is creating both opportunities and challenges for schools a few of them are listed below


Opportunities
Challenges
  • greater access to rich, multimedia content
  • increasing use of online course taking to offer classes not available
  • widespread availability of mobile computing devices that can access the internet
  • expanding role of social networking tools for learning & professional development
  • growing interest in the power of digital games for more personalized learning
  • schools are forever playing technological catch up as digital innovations emerge that require upgrading schools technological infrastructure & building professional development programs
  • creating a digital divide based largely on the quality of educational technology, rather than just simple access to the internet
  • rapide evolution of these also makes it increasingly challenging to determine what works best



Hottest Issues & Trends in Educational Technology


Technology Infrastructure


  • demands have changed from a focus on simply gaining connectivity to finding enough bandwidth to run more complex applications in classrooms:
    • streaming audio and video


  • Federal Communications Commission:
    • 97 percent of schools across the country had Internet connectivity as of 2010 (FCC, 2010).
    • Far fewer were able to successfully meet the need for higher speed access


  • October 2010 revised the E-rate
    • federal program that subsidizes school purchases for Internet connectivity, - allow schools to use E-Rate dollars to gain connectivity via dark fiber networks, among other reforms.
- “stated theory behind the reform was that by allowing more options for
connectivity, schools could in theory gain more bandwidth while at the
same time drive down cost because increasing the speed of fiber networks generally involves a one-time upgrade rather than consistent, periodic expenditures to secure more bandwidth via other connections.”
  • Spring of 2011
    • data released as part of the ongoing Speak Up research by Project Tomorrow found that restrictive Internet filtering was the top student complaint about Web use in 2010
    • Five years earlier, the chief complaint was connectivity speed
  • Federal government’s perceived desire to focus its efforts as a facilitator of infrastructure access has become somewhat controversial among education technology advocates.
    • especially evident when it became clear that the Enhancing Education Through Technology, or EETT, program, was in jeopardy.
      • was initially funded at $700 million annually but had dropped to $100 million by 2010 = only federal program within the U.S. Department of Education’s general funding devoted specifically to education technology
      • it was defunded as part of a federal budget compromise in the spring of 2011 (Education Week, April 29, 2011)
  • Huge differences in technology infrastructure remain among schools in the United States


Research


  • Interesting topic due to the fast pace changes that are continuously happening
  • Vast majority of the studies available are funded by the very companies and institutions that have created and promoted the technology, raising questions of the research’s validity and objectivity.
  • In addition, the kinds of studies that produce meaningful data often take several years to complete—a timeline that lags far behind the fast pace of emerging and evolving technologies.
  • The studies that do look at the effects of mobile technologies on learning are often based on small samples of students involved in short-term pilots, not the kind of large-scale, ongoing samples of students that educators and policymakers would like to see (Education Week, Feb. 23, 2011).

  • There are a handful of large-scale studies that do point to trends and observations in the education technology field
      • research initiative linked closely with the One-to-One Institute, - supports one-to-one laptop initiatives in K-12 schools, released a study about successful implementation models of education technology in October 2010.
      • results found that most of the schools that have integrated laptops and other digital tools into learning are not maximizing the use of those devices in ways that best make use of their potential.
      • Key Implementation Factors  (Rank Order of Predictive Strength)
1. Intervention classes: Technology is integrated into every
intervention class period.2
2. Change management leadership by principal: Leaders provide
time for teacher professional learning and collaboration at least
monthly.
3. Online collaboration: Students use technology daily for online
collaboration (games/simulations and social media).
4. Core subjects: Technology is integrated into core curriculum
weekly or more frequently.
5. Online formative assessments: Assessments are done at least
weekly.
6. Student-computer ratio: Lower ratios improve outcomes.
7. Virtual field trips:With more frequent use, virtual trips are
more powerful. e best schools do these at least monthly.
8. Search engines: Students use daily.
9. Principal training: Principals are trained in teacher buy-in, best
practices, and technology-transformed learning.
followed by a revised version of the report in September 2010
    • researchers cautioned that the vast majority of the studies in the meta-analysis = students in higher education, and as a result, the conclusions drawn may not be applicable to K-12 education.
    • “In fact, a major finding of the meta-study was the severe lack of rigorous research studies regarding online learning in K-12 (U.S. Department of Education, 2010).”
  • The Speak Up survey, which is conducted annually by Project Tomorrow  nonprofit research organization—and Blackboard, Inc.
    • surveyed nearly 300,000 students, parents, teachers, & other educators
    • results:
      • an increased interest from educators in mobile learning, as well as an increase in the number of students who own mobile devices such as smartphones, regardless of economic or demographic differences
      • an increased interest in online learning and blended learning opportunities, as well as electronic textbooks
E-learning


  • Online learning in many forms is on the rise in schools of all types across the country.
  • menu of options often includes:
    • full-time, for-profit virtual schools; state-sponsored virtual schools; supplemental online learning courses offered by brick-and-mortar schools; and charter schools presenting a hybrid option of digital material coupled with face-to-face instruction
  • The International Association for K-12 Online Learning, or iNACOL,
    • estimates that more than 1.5 million K-12 students were engaged in some form of online or blended learning in the 2009-10 school year
    • end of 2010 = supplemental or full-time online learning opportunities were available in at least 48 of 50 states, plus the District of Columbia (iNACOL, 2010).
  • At the end of 2010, 27 states plus the District of Columbia had full-time online schools serving students statewide, according to iNACOL’s report, “A National Primer on K-12 Online Learning.”


Pros
Cons
  • Some schools say it saves money and allows them to offer a wider variety of courses, including Advanced Placement classes
  • can help with scheduling conflicts when a face-to-face class is provided only at a time when a student already has another obligation
  • online courses can provide highly qualified teachers for classes otherwise not offered by a school
  • credit recovery = One of the fastest growing areas of e-learning
  • some researchers say students have had the most success with hybrid or blended education
  • “But full-time virtual schools also face the reality that for many students with two parents working outside the home such a scenario is not an option. Such students often cannot tap into full-time online schools for that reason, and virtual school providers acknowledge that their version of education works best, particularly in the lower grades, when an adult is present to assist.”
  • However, some educators and education experts have questioned the quality and academic rigor of these programs (Education Week, April 28, 2010).


Mobile Computing
  • following factors help make use of mobile devices popular & increased new trend:
    • Increasing access,
    • growing acceptance
    • decreasing cost
  • the digital divide between the affluent and disadvantaged still exists, mobile devices appear to have the potential to close it, at least in terms of access
  • “According to the “Horizon” report. The report predicts game-based learning will be widely adopted by mainstream classrooms within two to three years (New Media Consortium, 2011).”
  • Instead of educational software, e.g. Math Blaster or Reader Rabbit, students and teachers are much more likely to incorporate Web-based educational games into classrooms, which are often available for free
    • The National Science Foundation has played a large role in providing funding for the research and development of Web-based science games such as Crystal Island
  • Educators hope that games and simulations will:
    • provide a way for students to picture themselves in career paths they may otherwise would not have chosen, especially in the STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) subjects
    • offer students a way to connect what they are learning in class to (simulated) real-world situations in a safe and low-cost environment (Education Week, March 17, 2011)
    • may help students learn by helping them visualize processes they otherwise could not see, such as the flow of an electron or the construction of a city
    • can also promote higher-order thinking skills, such as collaboration, communication, problem-solving, and teamwork (MIT, 2009; National Academies Press 2011)


  • Challenges of using game and simulations for student learning:
  • creating a healthy marriage of an engaging and entertaining game with educational objectives and goals is a challenging process that has yet to be perfected.
  • To create and design games with the kind of high-resolution graphics and complex situations that children are used to seeing in commercial games takes a large amount of funding and time that educators often do not have.
  • finding the time and resources to train teachers who may not be familiar with game-based learning is a challenge for most schools.


Social Networking
  • what social networking tools work best and how to deploy them (Digital Directions, June 16, 2010) is now a new focus for schools
  • Some schools are using:
    • mainstream social networking tools, like Facebook,
      • promoting school events to organizing school clubs
      • more academic purposes related to assignments and class projects
  • Some concerns:
      • wary about security
      • advertising
      • information-sharing
      • social interaction in such an environment
  • ePals and eChalk:
    • are more restrictive
    • often allowing teachers and school officials:
      • limit not only who can join
      • also who students can talk to and interact with
    • often provide safety features that can detect foul language or bullying phrases and alert a teacher (Education Week, June 15, 2011)
    • I have never heard of these two but will check them out for sure
  • Some benefits:
      • allow students to work cooperatively on projects in an online environment that feels familiar to students
      • often report that a student who does not speak up in class will be more engaged
      • these sites allow instructors to extend the school day
      • professional development for educators
      • Wikis and blogs
        • allow students to work collaboratively and share their work with a limited or unlimited number of people
        • popular with teachers, particularly for allowing their students to connect with peers in other parts of the country or the world
        • archives and indexes images, videos, text and audio, are popular with all ages of students, including at the elementary level (Education Week, June 16, 2010)
        • I have not used either of these but have used a little of blogs in my class - I can see the benefits of including all of the above in my
classes

  • This article was very informative!  Great to see and hear about the timeline of technology in Education.  With taking these courses I have become more aware of ALL of the benefits of using technology in our schools and hope to continue to be on board with our districts efforts in making it the most effective for our students.
    We are very fortunate in OHLSD and have been providing all that we can to enable all of our students the ability to explore and be exposed to using technology in the classroom.  It would be great to have a blog to have a discussion board of what our district teachers use and how they feel it benefits them in their specific classroom.... maybe add this option to Jay and Christians site that they created for PD?

18 comments:

  1. Technology in education has evolved so much over the past couple of years. I have only been teaching for 5 years and I have seen the change each year. Five years ago, when I started teaching at BMS, we had computer labs. I believe we only had two computer labs (30 computers each) for about 600 students. Now we are using BYOD and almost have enough laptop computers for every student. Along with the computers each classroom has a smartboard, most have document cameras, senteos and we even have some IPod touches. We are very lucky in OHLSD. As a teacher in OHLSD, I have never taught without technology and I can't imagine doing so. I can't wait to see where technology will take us next!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I remember walking around Oakdale prior to my first interview and being so excited that every room had smartboards- I couldn't believe it, and I used it probably everyday my first year. Now, the technology has lost its novelty and I use it but not as often. I can't wait for when we see the next big thing come through our doors. And it sounds like BYOD is going to be at the elementary level very soon.

      Delete
    2. I agree that we are very lucky to have these resources for our students. Technology is a tool that adds to the learning in the classroom and provides students with added content and creative options.

      Delete
    3. We indeed are so fortunate to have access to so many resources. In the first school district where I taught, we had Smart Boards in only a few classrooms. I feel like a kid in a candy shop with all the useful, resourceful technology we have. Technology is wonderful, and necessary to 21st Century Learning, and to meet STEM goals. My hat is off to those who have made digital learning and technology such a priority in the district. There are a lot of things to be proud about at Oak Hills, and I think our technology and commitment to student learning with technology are two things about which we can be most proud and feel grateful and fortunate.

      Delete
  2. This is a great topic, technology plays a pivotal role in our classrooms, and it is truly a luxury we enjoy. Our students will benefit greatly from the application of technology and this demonstrates our commitment not only to our students to but to society in general, to create a more intelligent, responsible digital citizenry.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. A luxury or a necessity? I'd argue it is a necessity that students learn these skills at a young age in order to be successful later in life.

      Delete
  3. Technology is absolutely changing education. As in every field, we are trying to do more with less. I think technology is what allows this to happen and will only continue in the near future. I see the world of online education continuing to grow and become an integral part of every district. Online learning provides some great real-world experiences that will be important for our students to have prior to leaving the K-12 setting. I agree that there are some online programs out there that aren't as effective as a classroom setting but one could argue that there are some teachers that aren't very effective in a classroom either. I envision a mix of online and traditional courses, as I think there will always be value in having that face-to-face education and interaction.

    ReplyDelete
  4. As technology will be forever changing, so will the ways in which we teach. This will only be my fourth year as a teacher, and already I see an increasing trend with the amount of technology I incorporate each year. It definitely will take a relationship between government, district, administration and teachers to create this ever-changing tool, but it will be so worth the challenges we face with each new technology. Our kids will be better prepared for whatever comes their way.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree. In order for our students to truly be prepared for what is coming their way they will need to know how to use and adapt to new technologies. Therefore, we must find ways to expose them to as many different technologies as possible. Just imagine what is going to be coming their way 5 or 10 years from now.

      Delete
  5. I fear that as technology increases in the district, a large issue will continue to be the digital divide. Students can still have a fine education without technology, but the advantages that students in districts like ours gain are huge.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Do you think the digital divide will become a larger issue, or do you think the digital divide will begin to shrink?

      Delete
  6. Technology plays such a critical role in education. I believe that Christian is right when he says that technology isn't just a luxury, it's a necessity. It's not only a necessity, but technology is the key to students being successful in a 21st century global economy.

    ReplyDelete
  7. An important point that the article and Jeanna make is that the studies that prove the efficacy of technology ("the kinds of studies that produce meaningful data often take several years to complete") are often lagging way behing the breakneck speed of technology development. Although I can observe that students are benefitting from technology (high levels of engagement and interest, enjoying individual learning, interacting with media, digitally publishing), I wonder if the positive impacts can be measured so that our use of technology is data-driven. A 10-minute search of research articles bears the article's statement true: the research is having a hard time keeping up with usage in the classroom. Maybe I just didn't find it, but I had a hard time finding evaluative studies that are current (none that I found from 2012-13). The Meta Analysis (U.S. Department of Education) that the article mentions used research from 1996-2008.

    I do wonder if things are developing so quickly that we are not taking enough time to sort out effects on learning and if there are any negative side effects (though I have read about a number of positive effects) . I heard Ted Koppel on a radio show last week, and he was mentioning that a side effect of our knowledge-byte culture is that people generally do not take time to read long passages and think deeply, and I know not everyone would agree. Are we creating a "grab and go" type of learning that is fast-paced and high-pressured? Are we creating kids with ADD? anxiety? I love the tremendous advantages that we have in our district with an awesome technology menu. I hope our culture's understanding of the changes that have come and will come in education due to technology can be researched and continue to be data-driven, even at the crazy pace of development. That definitely is a challenge.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Nice work on looking further into it! I too am not sure that we have the ability to collect the most current data due to the fast paced changes of technology. It is an amazing tool and a great way to learn in which all of our students are growing up in...but I do feel that there is an importance that need not be lost in writing, reflecting with pen, drawing with pencils, reading by flipping the pages, etc. As we have discussed previously - it is something that we need to embrace and learn together with our students and find ways to make it educational, safe and engaging. All of us need to work together as Andrea mentioned to be sure that there is not a digital divide but a common goal with support to achieve that for ALL of our students using technology in their education.

      Delete
  8. Technology is changing at a tremendously fast pace. If you buy a laptop, it will become obsolete in 6 months if not sooner. Therefore, it is very challenging for schools to keep up with having the newest and best technology. I think that is why it is so important to have programs like BYOD because parents are more likely to update their child’s device at a much higher frequency than a school district can. This is positive for both the students and the school district because students can have the latest technology in the classroom that they can take home with them at the end of the day. It will be amazing to see what our students will be walking around with in 10 years.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Great point about BYOD, some of our students were given their devices for Christmas or Birthday presents because they knew that they could have an additional educational use for them at school. I worry that there is always going to be those without... but at the same time... we can not hold back in response to that fact. Instead we as a district find ways to work as Christian said doing more with less and try to find ways to stretch and make the most of it!

      Delete
    2. I completely agree! I am always shocked to see how many more devices kids bring into school from year to year. It seems to be increasing exponentially! Why not take advantage of this educational opportunity?

      Delete
  9. Just a few weeks ago I attended a small science teacher conference/PD in Chicago and I was completely shocked by the digital divide between the teachers. Many teachers boasted about their 1:1 program, and some even complained that that didn't have a LCD projector or even a computer issued to them by the school. There were teachers still using an overhead projector not because they wanted to, but because there was no other technology available. The conference consisted of new labs/projects to do with our students, and every lab consisted of new supplies that needed to be purchased. For 75% or so of the labs, I was able to find an interactive simulation online to use in place of the lab. This is saving us a LOT of money that would have needed to be used to purchase materials. I'm not sure some districts realize how much technology can actually SAVE them money!

    ReplyDelete